A detailed comparison of WebP and PNG for web performance, transparency, and quality
| Feature | WebP | PNG |
|---|---|---|
| Developed By | Google (2010) | PNG Development Group (1996) |
| Compression | Lossy & Lossless (both) | Lossless only |
| Transparency | Yes (alpha channel, 8-bit) | Yes (alpha channel, 8-bit) |
| Animation | Yes (animated WebP) | Yes (APNG) |
| Typical File Size | 25-35% smaller than PNG | Baseline (larger) |
| Max Colors | 16.7M (lossy), 256 (lossless) | 16.7M+ (24-bit or 48-bit) |
| Lossless Quality | Good (sometimes smaller than PNG) | Excellent (reference standard) |
| Lossy Mode | Yes (superior to JPEG) | No |
| Browser Support | 97%+ (not older Safari < 14) | 100% (universal) |
| META Support | EXIF, XMP | tEXt, iTXt chunks |
| Best For | Web images, performance optimization | Graphics, editing, archiving |
WebP uses VP8 (for lossy) and VP8L (for lossless) compression technologies developed by Google. The lossy mode typically produces files 25-34% smaller than JPEG at equivalent quality, while the lossless mode produces files 26% smaller than PNG on average. This dual-mode capability is one of WebP's biggest advantages - you can choose the best compression for each image.
PNG uses DEFLATE lossless compression (the same algorithm used in ZIP files). It's a well-tested, mature format that guarantees pixel-perfect reproduction. PNG doesn't offer lossy compression, which means every pixel is preserved but at the cost of larger file sizes, especially for complex images like photographs.
The file size difference between WebP and PNG is substantial and directly impacts web performance. A typical screenshot that's 500 KB as a PNG might be 300-350 KB as a lossless WebP. For a site with 50 images, that's a potential savings of 7.5-10 MB - significantly improving page load times, Core Web Vitals scores, and SEO rankings.
Google has been a strong advocate for WebP adoption, and it's one of the reasons Google's PageSpeed Insights tool recommends WebP conversion. Studies consistently show that faster-loading pages have lower bounce rates, higher conversion rates, and better search engine rankings.
Both formats support full alpha transparency, making them suitable for logos, icons, and images that need to blend over different backgrounds. WebP's alpha channel performs well, though in edge cases with very complex transparency patterns, PNG's lossless approach may preserve alpha edges more precisely.
WebP also supports lossy compression of the alpha channel itself, which can further reduce file size for images with simple transparency (like a logo with a drop shadow). This is a unique feature not available in PNG.
WebP support has grown dramatically since its introduction. As of 2025, WebP is supported by Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Opera, and Safari 14+ (released September 2020). This covers approximately 97% of global browser usage. The remaining 3% primarily consists of older iOS devices running pre-iOS 14.
PNG, being nearly 30 years old, has universal support across every browser, operating system, and image editing application ever made. If you need guaranteed compatibility with every possible client, PNG is the safest choice.
Both formats support animation: WebP has animated WebP, and PNG has APNG (Animated PNG). Animated WebP generally produces smaller files than animated GIF or APNG while maintaining better quality. However, APNG has broader tooling support in image editors and converters.
Convert and optimize your images with RiseTop's free tools:
For modern web development, WebP is the better choice in most scenarios - it offers smaller files, supports both lossy and lossless compression, handles transparency, and has near-universal browser support. Use PNG when you need guaranteed compatibility with every possible client, are archiving images for long-term preservation, or need pixel-perfect reproduction in professional editing workflows. The best approach is often to use WebP as your primary format with PNG fallbacks for older browsers.